Revision	Date	Originator	Checker	Approver	Description
Rev. A	Jul 2010	Benny Liu	Florence Yuen	Eric Ching	Draft
Rev. B	Jul 2010	Benny Liu	Florence Yuen	Eric Ching	For submission

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

In March 2005, the Project Proponent, Profit Point Enterprises Limited, acquired the development site in Yuen Long at Wo Shang Wai. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was carried out under the EIA Ordinance (EIAO) since then and the Environmental Permit (EP-311/2008A) for construction of the comprehensive development in Wo Shang Wai was granted by EPD on 9 September 2008. The Project involves the residential development and associated infrastructure and wetland restoration area and linear landscape area. The construction works under the Environmental Permit commenced on 12 May 2010.

Heng Shung Construction Co. Ltd. was commissioned as the Contractor for the Project. Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Ltd. (“MMHK”) has been commissioned by Heng Shung Construction Co. Ltd. to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services to carry out environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A) for both pre-construction and construction phases of the Proposed Comprehensive Development at Wo Shang Wai, Yuen Long.

According to the EP Condition 4.5, the monthly EM&A Report shall be submitted to the Director within 2 weeks after the end of the reporting month. This report summarises the findings during the period from 1 June to 30 June 2010.

1.2 Project Organization

The organisation chart and lines of communication with respect to the on-site environmental management structure together with the contact information of the key personnel are shown in Appendix A.

1.3 Environmental Status in the reporting period

During the reporting period, construction works of the Project undertaken include:

¡ Site formation for Wetland Restoration Area (WRA);

¡ Band drain work preparation; and

¡ Temporary drainage work

The Construction Works Programme of the Project is provided in Appendix B. The general layout plan of the Project site is shown in Figure 1.1.

1.4 Summary of EM&A Requirements

The EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality, noise, water quality, ecology and landscape and visual as specified in the approved EM&A Manual.

A summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

Parameters	Descriptions	Locations	Frequencies
Air Quality	24-Hour TSP	ASR1, ASR2A, ASR3, ASR4	Once every 6 days
Air Quality	1-Hour TSP	ASR1, ASR2A, ASR3, ASR4	3 times every 6 days
Noise	L_eq, 30min	NSR1, NSR3, NSR5, NSR7	Weekly
Water Quality	Dissolved Oxygen (DO), temperature, pH, suspended solids (SS) and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)	MP1 to MP6	3 days per week
Ecology	Birds	Within the Project Area and Assessment Area of 500m	Weekly
	Dragonflies and Butterflies	Within the Project Area and Assessment Area of 500m	Once per month during Mar and Sep to November, and twice per month during Apr to Aug
	Herpetofauna	Within the Project Area and Assessment Area of 500m	Once per month during Apr to Nov
	Water quality of WRA	Wetland Restoration Area	After filling of WRA with water, monthly for in situ water quality and every size months (end of wet season and end of dry season) for laboratory testing
	Site Inspections	Within the Project Area and Assessment Area of 500m	Weekly
Landscape and Visual	Auditing of protection of existing trees, the transplanting of existing trees, the creation of new wetland, the planting of new trees and shrubs and other landscape and visual mitigation measures	CM1 to CM10 and OM1 to OM7 within the Project Area	Site inspections once every two weeks during construction phase; once every two months during operational phase

The Environmental Quality Performance Limits for air quality, noise and water quality are shown in Appendix C.

The Event and Action Plan for air quality, noise and water quality are shown in Appendix D.

The monitoring schedule for the reporting month is shown in Table 1.2 below:

Table 1.2: Environmental Monitoring and Audit Schedule for June 2010

2. Impact Monitoring Methodology

2.1 Introduction

For air quality, construction noise and water quality, ecology, landscape and visual monitoring methodology, including the monitoring locations, monitoring equipments used, monitoring parameters, and frequency and duration etc., are detailed in this Chapter.

2.2 Air Quality

2.2.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

In accordance with the EM&A Manual, 1-hour and 24-hour TSP levels monitoring are to be conducted during the construction phase. Table 2.1 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of air quality monitoring.

Table 2.1: Air Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Monitoring Stations	Parameter	Frequency and Duration
ASR1, ASR2A, ASR3 & ASR4	24-hour TSP	At least once in every six-days
ASR1, ASR2A, ASR3 & ASR4	1-hour TSP	3 times every six-days

2.2.2 Monitoring Locations

The 4 air quality monitoring stations were established in the EM&A manual and were slightly adjusted during the baseline monitoring phase. Locations of the agreed air quality monitoring stations are listed in Table 2.2 and as shown in Figure 2.1.

Table 2.2: Air monitoring stations

Monitoring Stations	Locations
ASR1	Works Site Boundary
ASR2A	At the rooftop of refuse collection point, which is located at the southwest of the project area
ASR3	At the commercial centre at Palm Springs, which is located at the south of the project area
ASR4	Works Site Boundary

2.2.3 Monitoring Equipments

Continuous 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring is conducted using High Volume Sampler (HVS) (Model: GMWS-2310 Accu-vol). The HVS meets all the requirements of the EM&A Manual. Portable direct reading dust meters were used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring. Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring.

Table 2.3: TSP Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model
24-hr TSP monitoring
High Volume Sampler	GMWS 2310 Accu-vol
Calibrator	GMW 25
1-hr TSP monitoring
Portable direct reading dust meter	8520 Dust Track Aerosol Monitor

2.2.4 Monitoring Methodology

24-hour TSP Monitoring

Installation

The HVS was installed in the vicinity of the air sensitive receiver. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS.

· A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.

· The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.

· A minimum of 2 meters separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop sampler.

· A minimum of 2 meters separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.

· No furnace or incinerator flues or building vent were nearby.

· Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.

· The sampler has been more than 20 metres from any drip line.

· Permission was obtained to set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring stations.

· A secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the samplers.

Preparation of Filter Papers

· Glass fibre filters, were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.

· All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C with relative humidity (RH) < 50% and was not variable by more than ±5 %. A convenient working RH was 40%.

Field Monitoring

· The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.

· The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.

· The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.

· The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.

· The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.

· The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.

· The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.

· A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.

· The flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.1 m³/min. The range specified in the EM&A Manual was between 0.6-1.7 m³/min.

· The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hrs + 1 hr, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.

· The initial elapsed time was recorded.

· At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.

· It was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.

· All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.

· Filters were sent to a HOKLAS accredited laboratory for analysis.

Maintenance and Calibration

· The HVS and its accessories are maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.

· HVSs were calibrated prior to the commencement of baseline monitoring.

· Calibration records for HVSs are shown in Appendix E.

1-hour TSP Monitoring

Field Monitoring

The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:

· Set POWER to “ON”, push BATTERY button, make sure that the meter’s indicator is in the range with a red line and allow the instrument to stand for about 3 minutes (Then, the air sampling inlet has been capped).

· Push the knob at MEASURE position.

· Push “O-ADJ” button. (Then meter’s indication is 0).

· Push the knob at SENSI ADJ position and set the meter’s indication to S value described on the Test Report using the trimmer for SENSI ADJ.

· Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.

· Push “START” button.

Maintenance and Calibration

· The 1-hour dust meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year intervals throughout all stages of the air quality baseline monitoring.

· Calibration records for HVS and direct dust meters are shown in Appendix E.

2.3 Construction Noise

2.3.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Following the requirements in the EM&A Manual for noise, noise monitoring has to be carried out during the construction phase. Continuous noise monitoring for the A-weighted levels L_eq, L₁₀ and L₉₀ is undertaken once per every week.

Table 2.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of air quality monitoring.

Table 2.4: Noise Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Monitoring Stations	Parameter	Frequency and Duration
NSR1, NSR3, NSR5, NSR7	L_eq, L₉₀ & L₁₀	Once every week

2.3.2 Monitoring Locations

The 4 noise quality monitoring stations were established in the EM&A manual and were slightly adjusted during the baseline monitoring phase. Locations of the agreed noise quality monitoring stations are listed in Table 2.5 and as shown in Figure 2.2.

Table 2.5: Noise monitoring stations

Monitoring Stations	Locations	Type of measurement
NSR1	Noise monitoring equipment was set up near the boundary wall at Palm Springs.	Free-field
NSR3	The monitoring station was located next to the guard house at Palm Springs.	Facade
NSR5	The monitoring station was located within the work site boundary.	Free-field
NSR7	The monitoring station was located near the boundary wall of the house of Mai Po San Tsuen.	Free-field

2.3.3 Monitoring Equipments

Integrating Sound Level Meter will be used for noise monitoring. It is a Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L_eq) and percentile sound pressure level (L_x). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Table 2.6 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment model being used.

Table 2.6: Noise Monitoring Equipment

Monitoring locations	Equipment Model
	Integrating Sound Level Meter	Calibrator
NSR1	Rion NL-31	Rion NC-73
NSR3
NSR5
NSR7

2.3.4 Monitoring Methodology

Field Monitoring

· The Sound Level Meter was set on a tripod at a height of at least 1.2 m above the ground.

· Façade and free-field measurements were made at the monitoring locations.

· The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.

· Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:

- frequency weighting: A

- time weighting: Fast

- time measurement: 30 minutes intervals (between 0700 and 1900)

· Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1 kHz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid has to be repeated after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.

· During the monitoring period, the L_eq, L₁₀ and L₉₀ were recorded. In addition, any site observations and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.

Maintenance and Calibration

· The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.

· The meter and calibrator are sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.

· Calibration records are shown in Appendix E.

2.4 Water Quality

2.4.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

In accordance with the requirements in the EM&A Manual for water quality, water quality parameters including Dissolved Oxygen (DO), temperature, pH, turbidity, suspended solids (SS) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) have to be monitored at designated monitoring stations during construction of the Project. DO, temperature and pH were measured in-situ whereas SS and BOD were analysed in a laboratory. The measurements should be taken at all designated monitoring stations, 3 days per week. The interval between any two sets of monitoring was not less than 36 hours. Table 2.7 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of water quality monitoring.

Table 2.7: Water Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Monitoring Stations	Parameter	Frequency and Duration
MP1, MP2, MP3, MP4, MP5 & MP6	DO, temperature, pH, SS, turbidity, BOD	Three days every week

2.4.2 Monitoring Locations

The 6 water quality monitoring stations were established in the EM&A manual. Locations of the agreed water quality monitoring stations are listed in Table 2.8 and as shown in Figure 2.3.

Table 2.8: Water quality monitoring stations

Monitoring Stations	Easting	Northing
MP1	838 730.50	822 862.25
MP2	838 933.26	823 247.41
MP3	839 107.17	823 596.84
MP4	839 286.14	823 638.55
MP5	839 134.35	823 722.99
MP6	839 063.02	823 842.25

2.4.3 Monitoring Equipments

The Water Quality Monitoring Equipments and Analytical Methods applied to Water Quality Samples are given in Table 2.9 and Table 2.10 respectively. Details of which are discussed below.

Table 2.9: Water Quality Monitoring Equipments

Equipment	Model	Equipment /Serial Number
Dissolved oxygen, temperature & pH Measuring Meter	YSI Professional Plus	09K100735
Turbidimeter	Hach 2100Q	09120C000514
Global Positioning System (GPS)	Garmin eTrex Vista	ENO 007

Table 2.10: Analytical Methods applied to Water Quality Samples

Determinant, unit	Standard Method
Total Suspended Solids, mg/L	In house method based on APHA 2540D; ALS Method Code: EA-025
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), mg/L	In house method based on APHA 5210B; ALS Method Code: EP-030

All in-situ monitoring instruments were checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme before use.

Dissolved Oxygen (DO), temperature and pH measuring equipment

A portable, weatherproof multiparameter instrument YSI 556 MPS was used in the baseline monitoring. It can be capable for measuring dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and temperature simultaneously with the following limits:

· a dissolved oxygen level in the range of 0-50 mg/L and 0-500 % saturation;

· a temperature of -5 to 45 degree Celsius; and

· pH value of 0-14 with 0.1 as the base unit.

Turbidity Measurement Instrument

Portable and weatherproof turbidity meter (HACH model 2100P) was used during impact monitoring. It has a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU. Response of the sensor was checked with certified standard turbidity solutions before the start of measurement.

Global Positioning System

A hand-held GPS navigator (Garmin eTrex Vista) was used to identify the designated monitoring stations prior to water sampling.

Suspended Solids and BOD Measurements (Sample Containers and Storage)

Water samples for SS analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles with no preservative added, packed in ice (cooled to 4^oC without being frozen), delivered to the laboratory, and analysed as soon as possible after collection. Analysis was carried out in a HOKLAS accredited laboratory.

Detection Limit

The limits of detection for the in-situ and laboratory measurements are shown in Table 2.11.

Table 2.11: Detection Limits for Water Quality Determinants

Determinant	Limit of Detection
Dissolved Oxygen	0.1 mg/L
Temperature	0.1 degree Celsius
pH	0.01 unit
Turbidity	0.1 NTU
Suspended Solids	1 mg/L
BOD	2 mg/L

2.4.4 Monitoring Methodology

In situ measurement

All pH meters, DO/ temperature meters had been checked and calibrated prior to use. Standard buffer solution of at least 2 pH levels (either pH 4 and pH 7 or pH 7 and pH 10) had been used for calibration of the instrument before and after use.

DO meters had been calibrated by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme, and subsequently re-calibrated at 3 monthly intervals throughout all stages of the water quality monitoring. Responses of sensors and electrodes had been checked with certified standard solutions before each use. Wet bulb calibrations for all DO meters had been carried out before measurement at each monitoring location. For the on site calibration of field equipment, BS 127:1993, "Guide to field and on-site test methods for the analysis of waters" had been observed.

Measurements shall be at 3 water depths, namely, 1m below water surface, mid-depth and 1m above stream bed/pond bed, except where the water depth less that 6m, the middepth station maybe omitted. Should the water depth be less than 3m, only the mid-depth station will be monitored.

Replicates in-situ measurements and samples collected from each independent monitoring event are required for all parameters to ensure a robust statistically interpretable dataset.

Water Samples Preparation and Analysis

For collection of water sampling within the water courses, a 500ml clean plastic beaker was used. After collection, the water samples were stored in high-density polythene bottles. The sample container was rinsed with a portion of the water sample. The water sample was then transferred to the container, labelled with a unique sample ID and sealed with a screw cap. The water samples were stored in a cool box maintained at 4^oC. The water samples were then delivered to a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory (ALS) on the same day for analysis.

The testing methods of testing parameters as recommended by EIA or required by EPD, with the QA/QC results are in accordance with the requirement of HOKLAS or international accredited scheme.

The calibration certificates for equipments used for in-situ monitoring of water quality are attached in Appendix E.

2.5 Ecology

2.5.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Target species and certain other fauna will be monitored within the Project Area and Assessment Area during the wetland and residential construction phase. This will be important to ensure that any unexpected events or impacts either on- or off-site are quickly identified so that remedial action can be taken. The groups to be monitored and frequency of monitoring are shown in Table 2.12.

Table 2.12: Summary of Construction Phase Ecological Monitoring for the Wo Shang Wai WRA

	Construction Phase Ecological Monitoring
Birds	Weekly (including Assessment Area).
Dragonflies and Butterflies	Once per month during March and September to November, and twice per month during April to August.
Herpetofauna	Once per month during April to November.
Water Quality	After filling of WRA with water, monthly for in situ water quality and every six months (end of the wet season and end of the dry season) for laboratory testing.
Site Inspections	Weekly.

2.5.2 Monitoring Locations and Methodology

Ecological monitoring locations during construction phase are shown in Figure 4.1 and the methodology for ecological monitoring is detailed in Section 4.

2.6 Landscape and Visual

2.6.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

All measures undertaken by both the Contractor and the specialist Landscape Sub-Contractor during the construction phase and first year of the operational phase shall be audited by a Registered Landscape Architect, as a member of the ET, on a regular basis to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the measures. Site inspections should be undertaken at least once every two weeks throughout the construction period and once every two months during the operational phase.

The broad scope of audit is detailed below but should also be undertaken with reference to the more specific checklist provided in Table 2.13 below. Operational phase auditing will be restricted to the last 12 months of the establishment works of the landscaping proposals and thus only the items below concerning this period are relevant to the operational phase.

· The extent of the agreed works area should be regularly checked during the construction phase. Any trespass by the Contractor outside the limit of the works, including any damage to existing trees and woodland shall be noted;

· The progress of the engineering works should be regularly reviewed on site to identify the earliest practical opportunities for the landscape works to be undertaken;

· All existing vegetation, streams and other features within the study area which are not directly affected by the works are retained and protected;

· The methods of protecting existing vegetation proposed by the Contractor are acceptable and enforced;

· Preparation, lifting transport and re-planting operations for any transplanted trees;

· The layout, design and construction of buildings conforms to requirements specified in the EIA report;

· All landscaping works are carried out in accordance with the EIA recommendations and with specifications;

· The planting of new trees, shrubs, groundcover, climbers, grasses and other plans, together with the replanting of any transplanted trees are carried out properly and within the right season;

· All necessary horticultural operations and replacement planting are undertaken throughout the Establishment Period to ensure the healthy establishment and growth of both transplanted trees and all newly establishment plants.

Table 2.13: Construction and Operation Phase Audit Checklist

Area of Works	Items to be Monitored
Works Area	Check the extent of the Works to ensure that the Works Area is not exceeded
Protection of all trees and woodland blocks to be retained	Identification and demarcation of trees / vegetation to be retained, erection of physical protection (e.g. fencing), monitoring against possible incursion, physical damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc.
Streams	Ensure no run-off into existing streams
Clearance of existing vegetation	Identification and demarcation of trees / vegetation to be cleared, checking of extent of works to minimize damage, monitoring of adjacent areas against possible incursion, physical damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc.
Transplanting of trees	Identification and demarcation of trees / vegetation to be transplanted, monitoring of extent of pruning / lifting works to minimize damage, timing of operations implementation of all stages of preparatory and translocation works, and maintenance of transplanted vegetation, etc.
Topsoil stripping	Ensuring existing topsoil is stripped and stored under recognized good practice and is hydroseeded and regularly turned to prevent anaerobic conditions
New buildings	Ensure that building finishes accord with mitigation proposals with regard to colour and albedo.
Boundaries	Ensuring hoarding are erected as required
Noise Barrier	Ensure noise barrier design accords with the mitigation proposals with regard to location, materials and finishes.
Night-time lighting	Ensuring night-time lighting is directional, hooded and shielded away from VSRs
Plant supply	Monitoring of operations relating to the supply of specialist plant material (including the collecting, germination and growth of plants from seed) to ensure that plants will be available in time to be used within the construction works.
Landscape and wetland treatments generally	Check that wetland, and hard / soft landscape designs conform to intent of mitigation measures and agreed designs
Soiling, planting, etc.	Monitoring of implementation and maintenance of soiling and planting works against possible incursion, physical damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc.
Establishment Works	Monitoring of implementation of maintenance operation during Establishment Period

2.6.2 Monitoring Locations

The monitoring locations should check against the mitigation measures proposed under the approved Environmental Impact Assessment, which are summarised as follows:

Table 2.14: Proposed Construction Phase Mitigation Measures

ID No.	Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measure
CM1	The construction area and contractor’s temporary works areas should be minimised to avoid impacts on adjacent landscape.
CM2	Screening of construction works by hoardings/noise barriers around Works area in visually unobtrusive colours, to screen Works.
CM3	Reduction of construction period to practical minimum.
CM4	Topsoil, where identified, should be stripped and stored for re-use in the construction of the soft landscape works, where the soil material meets acceptable criteria and where practical. The Contract Specification shall include storage and reuse of topsoil as appropriate.
CM5	Hydroseeding or sheeting of soil stockpiles with visually unobtrusive material (in earth tone).
CM6	Advance screen planting to noise barriers.
CM7	Control night-time lighting and glare by hooding all lights.
CM8	Ensure no run-off into streams adjacent to Project Area.
CM9	Protection of existing trees on boundary of project area shall be carefully protected during construction. Detailed Tree Protection Specification shall be provided in the Contract Specification. Under this specification, the Contractor shall be required to submit, for approval, a detailed working method statement for the protection of trees prior to undertaking any works adjacent to all retained trees, including trees in contractor’s works areas. (Tree protection measures will be detailed at S16 and Tree Removal Application stage).
CM10	Trees unavoidably affected by the works shall be transplanted where practical. Trees should be transplanted straight to their destinations and not held in a nursery. A detailed Tree Transplanting Specification shall be provided in the Contract Specification, if applicable. Sufficient time for necessary tree root and crown preparation periods shall be allowed in the project programme.

Table 2.15: Proposed Operation Phase Mitigation Measures

ID No.	Landscape Mitigation Measure
OM1	Compensatory Tree Planting for all felled trees shall be provided to the satisfaction of relevant Government departments. Required numbers and locations of compensatory trees shall be determined and agreed separately with Government during the Tree Felling Application process under ETWBTC 3/2006.
OM2	A continuous belt of screen planting along southern perimeter of project area with fast growing tree species. At least 450 trees capable of reaching a height > 10m within 10 years should be planted. Planting of the belt of trees shall be carried out as advance works ahead of other site formation and building works.
OM3	Maximise soft landscape and amenity water bodies in residential areas of the development. Approximately 750 of trees (of Heavy Standard size) should be planted. Where space permits, roadside berms should be created. Street trees should be of species that reach a mature height of no less than 15m.
OM4	Maximise freshwater habitat wetland creation consistent with achieving other parameters. Min 4.74 ha to be provided. Wetlands must have natural edge profiles with >1m wide emergent zone. No access to the wetland by residents and all wetlands must be screened from residential development by a continuous tree screen at interface with residential development or earth mounding such that disturbance is minimised. Implementation of the wetland shall be carried out as advance works.
OM5	Use appropriate (visually unobtrusive and non-reflective) building materials and colours in built structures.
OM6	During detailed design, refine building layout to create a min 10m wide gap between buildings north of Wo Shang Wai pond and also two min 10m wide gaps in the row of buildings adjacent to Royal Palms.
OM7	Streetscape elements (e.g. paving, signage, street furniture, lighting etc.) shall be sensitively designed in a manner that responds to the local context, and minimises potential negative landscape and visual impacts. Lighting units should be directional and minimise unnecessary light spill.

3. Monitoring Results

3.1 Impact Monitoring Schedule

Impact monitoring for air quality (dust), noise and water quality due to the construction work were undertaken during the reporting month in compliance with the EM&A manual in the reporting period. Regular site inspections were carried out on 3, 9, 18, 23 and 30 June 2010 in the reporting month to assess the compliance with environmental requirements.

3.2 Result of Impact Monitoring

3.2.1 Air Quality Monitoring

3.2.1.1 1-hr TSP

Results of 1-hour TSP at the four monitoring locations are summarised in Table 3.1. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix F.

Table 3.1: Summary of 1-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Date	Start Time	1-hr TSP (μg/m³)			Range (μg/m³)	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
Monitoring Date	Start Time	1^st Result	2^nd Result	3^rd Result	Range (μg/m³)	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
ASR1
3-Jun-10	12:45	83	95	99	41 - 99	378		500
9-Jun-10	12:56	68	55	50
15-Jun-10	12:42	45	41	42
21-Jun-10	12:47	48	43	50
25-Jun-10	12:50	53	50	56
ASR2A
4-Jun-10	12:48	170	161	184	40 - 184	357		500
10-Jun-10	12:47	45	51	59
17-Jun-10	12:46	49	48	55
22-Jun-10	12:48	43	55	59
28-Jun-10	12:56	40	42	44
ASR3
4-Jun-10	8:50	106	120	132	41 - 132	358		500
10-Jun-10	9:04	57	56	44
17-Jun-10	8:45	59	52	61
22-Jun-10	8:55	55	45	42
28-Jun-10	8:53	41	46	48
ASR4
3-Jun-10	8:52	77	83	80	43 - 83	372		500
9-Jun-10	8:57	45	51	52
15-Jun-10	8:35	43	47	45
21-Jun-10	8:50	66	57	51
25-Jun-10	9:04	51	57	62

3.2.1.2 24-hr TSP

Results of 24-hour TSP at the four monitoring locations are summarised in Table 3.2. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix F.

Table 3.2: Summary of 24-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Date	Monitoring Results (μg/m³)	Range (μg/m³)	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
ASR1
3-Jun-10	88	64 - 88	226	260
9-Jun-10	70
15-Jun-10	85
21-Jun-10	64
25-Jun-10	67
ASR2A
4-Jun-10	79	48 - 89	213	260
10-Jun-10	48
17-Jun-10	86
22-Jun-10	69
28-Jun-10	67
ASR3
4-Jun-10	84	67 - 95	205	260
10-Jun-10	67
17-Jun-10	95
22-Jun-10	81
28-Jun-10	73
ASR4
3-Jun-10	100	68 - 100	237	260
9-Jun-10	68
15-Jun-10	86
21-Jun-10	74
25-Jun-10	77

No exceedance of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP (Action or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting period.

The weather conditions in the reporting period are provided in Appendix G.

3.2.2 Construction Noise Monitoring

The construction noise monitoring results are summarized in Table 3.3. Graphical plots of the monitoring data are shown in Appendix F.

Table 3.3: Summary of Construction noise monitoring results

Monitoring Date	Start Time	Mean & Range of Noise Levels, dB(A)			Limit Level for L_eq (dB)
Monitoring Date	Start Time	L_eq	L₁₀	L₉₀	Limit Level for L_eq (dB)
NSR1					> 75
10-Jun-10	13:16	59	63	55
17-Jun-10	13:10	58	61	52
22-Jun-10	13:11	52	54	48
28-Jun-10	13:18	57	60	51
NSR3
10-Jun-10	9:24	58	63	52
17-Jun-10	9:25	50	52	48
22-Jun-10	9:15	52	54	50
28-Jun-10	9:10	53	55	49
NSR5
3-Jun-10	13:01	56	59	54
9-Jun-10	13:14	57	59	53
15-Jun-10	13:02	57	59	53
21-Jun-10	13:04	53	55	50
NSR7
3-Jun-10	9:10	67	69	64
9-Jun-10	9:20	67	69	64
15-Jun-10	9:00	67	69	64
21-Jun-10	9:10	65	67	62

No exceedance (Action/Limit Level) of construction noise was recorded in the reporting period.

3.2.3 Water Quality Monitoring

The water quality monitoring results are summarized in Table 3.4. Graphical plots of the monitoring data are shown in Appendix F.

Table 3.4: Summary of Water quality monitoring results

Monitoring Date	Temp (^oC)	pH	Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)	DOS (%)	Turbidity (NT)	BOD (mg/L)	Suspended Solids (mg/L)
MP1
2/6/2010	24.6	7.2	2.1	24.9	44.9	4	52.5
4/6/2010	25.4	7.3	2.8	34.0	24.6	3	22
7/6/2010	26.3	7.4	3.3	40.1	14.2	8.5	16.5
9/6/2010	26.8	7.3	2.2	27.6	13.5	5	15.5
11/6/2010	27.3	7.4	1.7	20.7	25.2	6	41
15/6/2010	27.2	7.4	2.0	24.8	80.2	4	83
17/6/2010	28.6	7.5	2.1	26.5	60.0	3	72
19/6/2010	27.9	7.1	2.4	29.9	44.0	3	49.5
21/6/2010	29.1	7.6	4.6	60.7	38.7	9	38
23/6/2010	29.4	7.4	1.5	19.3	27.8	7	25
25/6/2010	29.3	7.5	2.4	31.4	51.9	4	17.5
28/6/2010	26.8	7.2	3.3	41.3	44.2	2.5	47
30/6/2010	27.9	7.5	4.4	55.7	35.9	3	28.5
Action Level	-	<5.5 or >7.5	<1.23	-	>173	-	>231
Limit Level	-	<4.0 or >8.0	<1.17	-	>177	-	>299

MP2
2/6/2010	25.5	7.4	3.3	39.7	44.6	3	63
4/6/2010	25.8	7.4	3.9	47.2	19.9	2	26.5
7/6/2010	25.9	7.4	2.8	34.0	11.4	6	12
9/6/2010	26.1	7.3	3.2	39.8	18.1	4	26.5
11/6/2010	27.5	7.4	1.8	23.1	13.6	4	13.5
15/6/2010	27.2	7.3	2.5	31.6	55.4	3	67.5
17/6/2010	28.8	7.6	2.1	27.3	61.1	2	70.5
19/6/2010	27.6	7.5	5.0	63.5	20.3	2	23
21/6/2010	28.0	7.3	3.0	38.7	12.9	3	12.5
23/6/2010	29.0	7.4	1.5	20.1	28.2	7	26.5
25/6/2010	29.0	7.5	3.0	39.7	32.1	5	17.5
28/6/2010	27.1	7.1	3.1	39.1	25.8	2	19
30/6/2010	27.5	7.6	5.5	70.2	14.3	3	25
Action Level	-	<5.5 or >7.5	<1.04	-	>132	-	>170
Limit Level	-	<4.0 or >8.0	<0.89	-	>163	-	>209

MP3
2/6/2010	23.4	7.8	5.7	67.8	81.8	11.5	95
4/6/2010	25.3	8.2	8.0	97.7	51.6	13.5	58.5
7/6/2010	27.8	8.6	8.7	111.3	122.5	18	123
9/6/2010	25.2	7.2	3.3	40.0	100.3	32	90.5
11/6/2010	29.3	8.9	9.5	124.3	18.7	9.5	23.5
15/6/2010	28.2	7.5	2.3	30.0	11.5	3	14.5
17/6/2010	29.6	7.6	2.5	32.2	8.6	<2	7
19/6/2010	29.2	7.3	2.9	38.0	8.6	2	6
21/6/2010	30.5	7.8	7.0	93.5	27.7	6	30
23/6/2010	29.5	7.6	4.8	63.3	41.6	7	40.5
25/6/2010	29.6	7.8	6.2	81.9	88.1	6	47.5
28/6/2010	27.3	7.5	5.4	69.3	53.2	4.5	46
30/6/2010	28.8	7.6	7.4	96.5	44.8	7	41.5
Action Level	-	<5.5 or >7.5	<6.85	-	>64	-	>65
Limit Level	-	<4.0 or >8.0	<6.65	-	>67	-	>66

MP4
2/6/2010	23.8	6.9	1.2	13.8	31.5	3.5	22
4/6/2010	24.5	7.1	1.0	11.3	20.8	5.5	17
7/6/2010	25.6	7.2	1.0	12.1	23.8	7.5	16
9/6/2010	25.4	7.0	3.8	45.9	15.8	5	14
11/6/2010	28.3	7.5	2.1	26.6	19.5	3	16.5
15/6/2010	28.1	7.1	1.8	22.1	31.3	7	32.5
17/6/2010	29.1	7.3	1.1	14.4	23.2	4	14
19/6/2010	28.2	6.9	0.9	11.1	37.1	4	12
21/6/2010	29.0	6.9	0.7	8.7	47.2	3.5	29.5
23/6/2010	29.4	6.9	1.5	18.4	25.0	4	17.5
25/6/2010	28.8	7.0	0.5	7.4	20.1	6	13
28/6/2010	26.9	7.1	5.3	66.0	32.0	4.5	25.5
30/6/2010	28.6	7.0	0.6	7.9	106.5	4.5	98.5
Action Level	-	<5.5 or >7.5	<3.91	-	>60	-	>50
Limit Level	-	<4.0 or >8.0	<3.82	-	>64	-	>53

MP5
2/6/2010	23.6	7.3	1.7	19.3	26.7	3	19.5
4/6/2010	25.0	7.3	2.3	26.9	39.9	3.5	26
7/6/2010	27.6	7.6	2.9	37.2	34.7	6.5	29.5
9/6/2010	25.9	7.3	4.2	52.2	25.2	4	26
11/6/2010	29.5	7.5	3.7	48.2	79.4	4.5	71.5
15/6/2010	28.3	7.3	1.4	17.8	90.1	11.5	99.5
17/6/2010	29.2	7.4	1.4	18.3	21.2	5.5	17.5
19/6/2010	29.2	7.3	3.0	38.9	43.3	6	34.5
21/6/2010	30.0	7.4	5.3	70.0	68.8	10.5	65
23/6/2010	30.0	7.2	1.3	16.4	25.8	7	23
25/6/2010	28.6	7.2	0.6	7.8	19.2	9	21
28/6/2010	27.0	6.9	1.6	20.0	35.7	5	19
30/6/2010	28.6	7.2	1.5	19.9	77.2	5	61.5
Action Level	-	<5.5 or >7.5	<4.13	-	>81	-	>66
Limit Level	-	<4.0 or >8.0	<3.87	-	>84	-	>69

MP6
2/6/2010	23.7	7.5	2.5	29.9	45.6	4.5	39
4/6/2010	24.9	7.6	2.9	34.9	79.4	4	55
7/6/2010	27.3	7.8	3.5	43.0	98.2	8	75.5
9/6/2010	26.1	7.9	2.9	35.0	156.5	11.5	97.5
11/6/2010	28.5	7.4	4.3	54.8	41.1	3.5	32
15/6/2010	28.0	7.4	1.2	14.5	82.0	14	65
17/6/2010	30.2	7.7	4.0	53.4	32.6	3.5	24.5
19/6/2010	29.3	7.3	2.9	37.6	29.4	5	21.5
21/6/2010	30.6	7.4	4.2	55.6	65.3	5	51
23/6/2010	29.6	7.3	1.8	23.0	49.7	4	34
25/6/2010	28.6	7.5	1.8	22.1	107.0	9	64
28/6/2010	26.8	7.0	2.4	29.3	95.7	2.5	56
30/6/2010	29.9	7.3	2.1	28.1	68.6	2	40
Action Level	-	<5.5 or >7.5	<4.61	-	>94	-	>75
Limit Level	-	<4.0 or >8.0	<4.52	-	>96	-	>75

Notes:

Values Bold indicate Action Level exceedance.

Values Underlined and Bold indicate Limit Level exceedance.

Exceedances of pH, DO, turbidity and SS were observed. For MP1 and MP2, there were slight exceedance of action level for pH on 17 (MP2), 21 (MP1) and 30 (MP2) June 2010. For MP3, there were exceedances of pH, DO, turbidity and SS (action and limit levels) on different monitoring dates. At MP4, there were exceedances of limit level for turbidity on 30 June 2010. At MP5, pH was exceeded (Action Level) on 7 June 2010 while turbidity and SS were exceeded on 11 and 15 June 2010 (Limit Level for SS on 11 June and Limit Level for turbidity and SS on 15 June 2010). The pH was exceeded (Action Level) on 4, 7, 9, and 17 June 2010 at MP6 during the monitoring period and there were exceedances of turbidity and SS on 7, 9, 25 and 28 June 2010 (Limit Level of turbidity and SS on 7 and 9 June; Limit Level of turbidity on 25 June; and Action Level of turbidity on 28 June 2010). For MP3, MP4, MP5, and MP6, the DO levels were exceeded on most of the monitoring dates.

The Event and Action Plan in Appendix D was followed under these cases of exceedances.

From investigation, the Contractor has implemented water quality mitigation measures as recommended in the EIA report, including the provision of temporary drainage facility and associated treatment facility. Sand bags are in place in the temporary drainage channel to enhance the desilting efficiency. The Contractor further enhanced the water quality mitigation measures by erecting several segments of rock bunds at the discharge outlet to avoid site runoff draining directly to the northern ditches.

Re-profiling earthworks were observed at the adjacent fish ponds by the fish pond owner so the exceedances at MP3 from 2 to 9 June 2010 were considered invalid. Exceedance of turbidity at MP3 on 25 June 2010 was considered not due to construction works as no muddy water discharge to the ponds was observed from the site during sampling according to our monitoring team. The exceedance was likely to be caused by localised factors rather than the project works.

The exceedance of SS and turbidity at MP5 on 15 June 2010 were considered not due to construction works as the location of MP6, which is close to the discharge outlet at the east of construction site, both SS and turbidity level were less than MP5 (Turbidity and SS level at MP6 were 82 NTU and 65 mg/L respectively). Similarly, the exceedance of turbidity at MP4 on 30 June 2010 was considered not due to construction works as for the location of MP6, both SS and turbidity level are less than MP4 (SS and turbidity level at MP6 were 40 mg/L and 68.6 NTU respectively). Moreover, as noted by monitoring team during on-site sampling, no direct muddy water discharge was observed from the site. The exceedances were considered not due to construction works. However, possible source of discharge which may give rise to the exceedance was unknown.

For the exceedance of turbidity at MP6 on 25 and 28 Jun 2010, the cause of exceedance could be related to the algae growth. Since turbidity is to measure the degree of water for loosing its transparency due to the presence of suspended particulates; from our recent site observation, the colour of the ditches were observed in pale green and algae growth was noted in the stream. The algae growth could reduce water clarity and cause increase in turbidity level. As such, the elevated turbidity could be caused by the recent growth of organic particles which would affect water clarity. Moreover, for the main source of construction runoff, the measured level of SS on both days were low (SS level on 25 and 28 Jun 2010 is 64 mg/L and 56 mg/L respectively) without triggering exceedance as wastewater treatment facilities were provided by Contractor on site and are located near the discharge point to treat muddy wastewater prior to discharge. As such, the exceedances were considered not due to construction works.

DO and pH exceedance may be due to the natural variation, as the temperature was higher when compared with baseline monitoring period. The exceedances were considered not due to construction works.

The Contractor was reminded to implement the water quality mitigation measures in accordance with the recommendation stated in Section 5.6.1 – 5.6.4 of the EIA Report as far as practicable and regular spot check would be conducted on the nearby discharge by Contractor and inform ET for investigation.

4. Ecological Monitoring

4.1 Introduction

Construction phase ecological monitoring commenced on 12 May 2010. This report documents surveys conducted in the Survey Area between 1 June and 30 June 2010. Survey Area is provided in Figure 4.1. Dates and ecological surveys conducted during this period are given in Appendix H.

4.2 Monitoring of Birds

Monitoring was undertaken following the survey methodology in the EM&A Manual. A transect was followed in the bird surveys (see Figure 4.1). All bird species of conservation importance and/or wetland dependent were identified and enumerated. Flying birds were not recorded unless they were foraging and associated with the habitat (such as swifts). Further, notable bird observations during other surveys were also recorded.

Bird surveys were conducted on a weekly basis. A total of 15 bird species of conservation importance and/or wetland-dependence were recorded using the ponds within 500 m of the Project Site. A summary of survey data is provided in Appendix I.

Species and numbers recorded in this survey period are typical of fish pond area during the summer months indicating that birds in the area are not presently being adversely affected by the construction.

4.3 Monitoring of Herpetofauna

One day time and one night time herpetofauna survey was conducted. Two amphibian species (Günther’s Frog Rana guentheri and Ornate Pigmy Frog Microhyla ornata) and one reptile species (Bowring's Gecko Hemidactylus bowringii) were recorded. Both species are very common and widespread in northwestern Hong Kong. A summary of the survey findings are provided in Appendix J.

4.4 Monitoring of Dragonfly and Butterfly

Monitoring of dragonfly and butterfly was conducted on a bi-monthly basis. A total of 9 dragonfly species and 7 butterfly species were recorded. One dragonfly species (Coastal Glider Macrodiplax cora) that is considered to be uncommon and of Local Concern in Hong Kong was recorded in a high number during the surveys; while several individuals of Scarlet Basker (Urothemis signata), also listed of Local Concern, were recorded on one survey. All butterflies recorded were common and widespread species recorded in low to very low numbers. A summary of the survey findings are provided in Appendix J.

4.5 Monitoring of Mammal

Monitoring of mammal was conducted concurrently with other surveys. No mammals were recorded in the survey period.

4.6 Summary

Ecological monitoring were carried out following the survey methodology and frequency outlined in the EM&A Manual (March 2008) in June 2010.

A total of 15 bird species, 2 amphibian species, 1 reptile species, 9 dragonfly species and 7 butterfly species were recorded. Survey findings indicate that the ponds within the Survey Area supported numbers and diversity of wetland-dependent birds and other species of conservation importance typical of fish pond areas in the early summer months.

5. Landscape and Visual

5.1 Site Inspection

The EM&A programme for Landscape and Visual impact due to the construction commenced in May 2010 and was continued during the reporting period. Site inspections were carried out on 9 and 23 June 2010 to confirm the implementation of mitigation measures at construction stage.

5.2 Construction Phase Audit Summary

The audit was undertaken with references to the specific checklists provided in Tables 2.13 – 2.15 and audit results are summarized as below:

Table 5.1: Construction and Operation Phase Audit Summary

Area of Works	Items to be Monitored
Works Area	The works area was confined by site hoardings and noise barriers at the site boundaries. No works exceeded the site boundaries was observed.
Protection of all trees and woodland blocks to be retained	An area of reedbed was preserved and confined with fencing on site as nursery for the replanting to future wetland restoration area. Trees retained and transplanted were fenced off by site hoardings and noise barriers.
Streams	Mitigation measures including gravels deposit and barrier installation at the temporary drainage channel to filter and intercept site runoff, provision of sedimentation tanks and aqua sed to provide primary treatment of the discharge.
Clearance of existing vegetation	Site clearance was completed prior to the commencement of construction. An area of reedbed was preserved and confined with fencing on site.
Transplanting of trees	Trees transplanting was completed with strip planting along the southern site boundary.
Topsoil stripping	Topsoil and marine sediment to be reused on site were stockpiled on site with taupaulin sheet covered or compacted and keep moist to minimize dust generation.
New buildings	Not relevant
Boundaries	Hoardings were erected as required
Noise Barrier	Noise barriers design accords with the mitigation proposals with upper 7 or 6 m portion in translucent material with green tinted to match with the environment. All noise barriers were constructed at locations according to the mitigation proposals.
Night-time lighting	No night-time works were carried out during the monitoring period.
Plant supply	The advance strip plantings were supplied by landscape contractor and the planting period is in appropriate season to facilitate the establishment of the plants. Some new trees planted along the site boundary were observed dead, as a result of the shading effect from the tree crown spreaded from the adjacent developments over the site. Dead trees were either replaced or replanted with shrubs that tolerate to shading. The shading effect by the trees from adjacent development will be continued monitor. The planting strategy and maintenance of strip planting has to review for long term management of the trees.
Landscape and wetland treatments generally	The wetland restoration area is under construction.
Soiling, planting, etc.	The strip planting with compensatory and transplanted trees has not been hand over for maintenance, the planting works are under supervision on-site to ensure meeting the requirement in the approved planting proposal.
Establishment Works	The strip planting has not been hand over. Monitoring will be carried out in next phase.

6. Environmental Site Inspection and Audit

6.1 Site Inspection

The ET had carried out construction phase weekly site inspections on 3, 9, 18, 23 and 30 June 2010. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary. The key observations from site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations

Key Observations	ET Recommendation	Contractor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken	Close-out (Date)
Water ponding in the site	To clear stagnant water frequently	Agreed and on-going during the wet season	-
Chemical bottles were placed on the ground at the wastewater treatment facility.	To provide drip trays to avoid land contamination	Agreed and action taken	9 Jun 2010
Dusty haul road	To provide watering to the haul road to suppress dust emission	Agreed and action taken	9 Jun 2010
Oil stain was observed in a small section of the drainage channel. The oil was suspected to have leaked from machinery	To use oil absorbent to clear the oil inside the channel and prevent oil leakage from machines	Agreed and action taken	18 Jun 2010
Dark smoke was observed at an excavator	To stop its operation and provide maintenance	Agreed and action taken	23 Jun 2010
Stockpiles in the site	To either cover with tarpaulin and/or lower the stockpiles and provide compaction/watering	Agreed and action taken	23 Jun 2010
Unused temporary drainage	To backfill unused temporary drainage	Agreed and on-going	-
Dust at the haul road inside the works area	To provide sufficient watering to suppress dust	Agreed and on-going	-
Settled sand and silt was observed inside the main temporary drainage channel	To clear the settled sand and silt frequently	Agreed and action taken	8 Jul 2010
Stagnant water inside containers	To clear all stagnant water inside containers	Agreed and action taken	30 Jun 2010
One AquaSed unit stopped operation and required maintenance	To repair the AquaSed as soon as possible		8 Jul 2010

6.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status

The Contractor has been registered as a chemical waste producer for the Project. Construction and demolition (C&D) material sorting was carried out on site. A sufficient number of receptacles were available for general refuse collection.

As advised by the Contractor, 256.5 tonnes of C&D material were generated on site and disposed off at Public Fill Reception Facilities at Tuen Mun Area 38 during the period. No metals was generated and collected by registered recycling collector. No paper cardboard packing and plastic were generated on site and collected by registered recycling collector. No chemical waste was generated and collected by licensed chemical waste collector. 5.7 tonnes of other types of wastes (e.g. general refuse) was generated on site and disposed of at North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill.

The Contractor is advised to maintain on site waste sorting and recording system and maximize reuse/recycling of C&D wastes.

6.3 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits

The environmental permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid during the period is summarised in Table 6.2.

Table 6.2: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits

Statutory Reference	Description	Permit /Reference No.	Status
EIAO	Environmental Permit	EP-311/2008A	Valid
APCO	Notification of Construction Work under APCO	316688 (27 Apr 2010)	Valid
WPCO	Discharge License	(Application no.: 313815)	Under Application (Submitted on 22 Jan 2010)
WDO	Registration as Chemical Waste Producer	WPN0000-542-H3083-04	Valid
WDO	Bill Account for disposal	700945423	Valid

Legend: EIAO – Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance

APCO – Air Pollution Control Ordinance

WPCO – Water Pollution Control Ordinance

WDO – Waste Disposal Ordinance

6.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures

The EM&A programme followed the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A manual. The EM&A requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix K. In particular, the following mitigation measures were brought to attention during the site audits:

Air Quality

· All stockpiles should be covered by tarpaulin or kept wet by water spraying;

· All vehicles should be washed to remove any dusty materials before leaving the construction sites;

· the portion of road leading the construction site that is within 30m of a designated vehicle entrance or exit should be kept clear of dusty materials;

· Sufficient water spraying should be provided at haul road to reduce dust emission; and

· Ensure proper functioning of the wheel wash facility.

Noise

· Mobile plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible;

· Plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction should be orientated to direct noise away from the NSRs; and

· The construction activities should be better scheduled to reduce noise nuisance.

Water Quality

· Water accumulated in the site (including water inside drip trays) should be cleared frequently;

· Ensure proper functioning of the wastewater treatment facility;

· Silt and debris should be removed from the temporary drainage channel regularly; and

· Any soil contaminated with chemicals/oils shall be removed from site and the void created shall be filled with suitable materials.

Waste management

· Reuse the excavated materials as far as practical to reduce the amount of waste disposal;

· Ensure drip trays are provided for chemical containers to prevent leakage or soil contamination;

· All plants and vehicles should be properly maintained to prevent oil leakage;

· Oil stains on soil should be cleared by disposal of contaminated soil; and

· Ventilation should be provided for the Chemical Store Room.

7. Report on Non-compliance, Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

7.1 Record on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels

There is no breach of Action or Limit Levels for Air Quality and Noise monitoring in the reporting month.

Exceedances of Action and Limit Levels were recorded for Water Quality at MP1, MP2, MP3, MP4, MP5 and MP6 on different monitoring dates.

Table 7.1: Summary of exceedances in Water Quality

Monitoring Date	pH	Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)	Turbidity (NT)	Suspended Solids (mg/L)
MP1
21/6/2010	7.6	4.6	38.7	38
Action Level	<5.5 or >7.5	<1.23	>173	>231
Limit Level	<4.0 or >8.0	<1.17	>177	>299

MP2
17/6/2010	7.6	2.1	61.1	70.5
30/6/2010	7.6	5.5	14.3	25
Action Level	<5.5 or >7.5	<1.04	>132	>170
Limit Level	<4.0 or >8.0	<0.89	>163	>209

MP3
2/6/2010	7.8	5.7	81.8	95
4/6/2010	8.2	8.0	51.6	58.5
7/6/2010	8.6	8.7	122.5	123
9/6/2010	7.2	3.3	100.3	90.5
11/6/2010	8.9	9.5	18.7	23.5
15/6/2010	7.5	2.3	11.5	14.5
17/6/2010	7.6	2.5	8.6	7
19/6/2010	7.3	2.9	8.6	6
21/6/2010	7.8	7.0	27.7	30
23/6/2010	7.6	4.8	41.6	40.5
25/6/2010	7.8	6.2	88.1	47.5
28/6/2010	7.5	5.4	53.2	46
30/6/2010	7.6	7.4	44.8	41.5
Action Level	<5.5 or >7.5	<6.85	>64	>65
Limit Level	<4.0 or >8.0	<6.65	>67	>66

MP4
2/6/2010	6.9	1.2	31.5	22
4/6/2010	7.1	1.0	20.8	17
7/6/2010	7.2	1.0	23.8	16
9/6/2010	7.0	3.8	15.8	14
11/6/2010	7.5	2.1	19.5	16.5
15/6/2010	7.1	1.8	31.3	32.5
17/6/2010	7.3	1.1	23.2	14
19/6/2010	6.9	0.9	37.1	12
21/6/2010	6.9	0.7	47.2	29.5
23/6/2010	6.9	1.5	25.0	17.5
25/6/2010	7.0	0.5	20.1	13
30/6/2010	7.0	0.6	106.5	98.5
Action Level	<5.5 or >7.5	<3.91	>60	>50
Limit Level	<4.0 or >8.0	<3.82	>64	>53

MP5
2/6/2010	7.3	1.7	26.7	19.5
4/6/2010	7.3	2.3	39.9	26
7/6/2010	7.6	2.9	34.7	29.5
11/6/2010	7.5	3.7	79.4	71.5
15/6/2010	7.3	1.4	90.1	99.5
17/6/2010	7.4	1.4	21.2	17.5
19/6/2010	7.3	3.0	43.3	34.5
23/6/2010	7.2	1.3	25.8	23
25/6/2010	7.2	0.6	19.2	21
28/6/2010	6.9	1.6	35.7	19
30/6/2010	7.2	1.5	77.2	61.5
Action Level	<5.5 or >7.5	<4.13	>81	>66
Limit Level	<4.0 or >8.0	<3.87	>84	>69

MP6
2/6/2010	7.5	2.5	45.6	39
4/6/2010	7.6	2.9	79.4	55
7/6/2010	7.8	3.5	98.2	75.5
9/6/2010	7.9	2.9	156.5	97.5
11/6/2010	7.4	4.3	41.1	32
15/6/2010	7.4	1.2	82.0	65
17/6/2010	7.7	4.0	32.6	24.5
19/6/2010	7.3	2.9	29.4	21.5
21/6/2010	7.4	4.2	65.3	51
23/6/2010	7.3	1.8	49.7	34
25/6/2010	7.5	1.8	107.0	64
28/6/2010	7.0	2.4	95.7	56
30/6/2010	7.3	2.1	68.6	40
Action Level	<5.5 or >7.5	<4.61	>94	>75
Limit Level	<4.0 or >8.0	<4.52	>96	>75

Notes:

Values Bold indicate Action Level exceedance.

Values Underlined and Bold indicate Limit Level exceedance.

7.2 Record on Environmental Complaints received

No environmental complaint was received this month.

7.3 Record on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution

No notifications of summons or successful prosecution were received this month.

7.4 Review of reasons for and implications of non-compliance, complaints, summons and prosecutions

Investigations have been carried out to identify the causes of exceedance. The investigation reports for the exceedances happened during the reporting period have been sent to the IEC for review. Currently the investigation report for exceedances from 23 to 30 June 2010 is under review and revision by ET.

From investigation, construction activities during the period of exceedance included mainly site clearance, site formation, and drainage work. It was observed that the Contractor has implemented water quality mitigation measures as recommended in the EIA report, including the provision of temporary drainage facility and associated treatment facility. Sand bags are in place in the temporary drainage channel to enhance the desilting efficiency. The Contractor further enhanced the water quality mitigation measures by erecting several segments of rock bunds at the discharge outlet to avoid site runoff draining directly to the northern ditches.

With external factors affect the adjacent environments, such as the re-profiling works carried out at the fish ponds and natural variations, the exceedances were considered not due to construction works.

7.5 Follow-up actions taken

As non-compliances have been recorded, the Event and Action Plan has been followed. Although it is considered that the exceedances were not related to the Project, the Contractor was reminded to implement the water quality mitigation measures in accordance with the recommendation stated in Section 5.6.1 – 5.6.4 of the EIA Report as far as practicable and regular spot check would be conducted on the nearby discharge by Contractor and inform ET for investigation.

As wet weather has come, to cater for the increase of site runoff, the Contractor would further enhance the water quality mitigation measures by erecting several segments of rock bunds at the discharge outlet to avoid site runoff draining directly to the northern ditches.

7.6 Cumulative statistics for complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions

Cumulative statistics for complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions for the Project account for period starting from the date of commencement of construction (i.e. 12 May 2010) to the end of the reporting month and are summarized in the Table 7.2 below.

Table 7.2: Statistics for complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions

Reporting Period	Cumulative Statistics
	Complaints	Notifications of summons	Successful prosecutions
This reporting month (Jun 2010)	0	0	0
From 12 May 2010 to end of the reporting month (Jun 2010)	0	0	0

8. Future key Issue

8.1 Site Preparatory Works and Construction Works for the Coming Month

The major site works to be commissioned in the coming month include:

¡ Site formation and drainage work for Wetland Restoration Area (WRA);

¡ Installation of Band Drain; and

¡ Trial Embankment for Ground Improvement

8.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month

Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:

¡ Generation of dust from activities on-site (esp. for Trial Embankment);

¡ Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;

¡ Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;

¡ Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste from activities on-site; and

¡ Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.

8.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month

The environmental site inspection and environmental monitoring will be continued in the coming month. Impact monitoring for air, noise, water quality, ecology and landscape and visual in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual has commenced since 12 May 2010. The tentative monitoring schedule for July 2010 is shown in the Table 8.1.

Table 8.1: Tentative Environmental Monitoring and Audit Schedule for July 2010

8.4 Conclusions and Recommendations

8.4.1 Conclusions

The EM&A programme as recommended in the EM&A manual has been undertaken in the reporting month since 12 May 2010.

Monitoring of Air Quality, Noise, Water Quality, Ecology and Landscape and Visual impacts due to the Project was under way. In particular, the 1-hr TSP, 24-hr TSP, noise level (as L_eq) and water quality parameters (such as pH, DO and SS) under monitoring have been checked against established Action and Limit levels.

There was no breach of Action and Limit Levels for 1-hr TSP, 24-hr TSP and noise in the reporting month.

Action and Limit Level exceedances of pH, DO, turbidity and SS were recorded at water quality monitoring stations including MP1, MP2, MP3, MP4, MP5 and MP6. However, Investigations on the exceedance showed that the exceedances were not related to the Project and may have been due to external factors such as the re-profiling works in the fish ponds and natural variations.

8.4.2 Recommendations

With considerations on the construction activities and environment, the following recommendations were provided:

Air Quality

· All stockpiles should be covered by tarpaulin or kept wet by water spraying;

· All vehicles should be washed to remove any dusty materials before leaving the construction sites;

· the portion of road leading the construction site that is within 30m of a designated vehicle entrance or exit should be kept clear of dusty materials;

· Sufficient water spraying should be provided at haul road to reduce dust emission; and

· Ensure proper functioning of the wheel wash facility.

Noise

· Mobile plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible;

· Plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction should be orientated to direct noise away from the NSRs; and

· The construction activities should be better scheduled to reduce noise nuisance.

Water Quality

· Water accumulated in the site (including water inside drip trays) should be cleared frequently;

· Ensure proper functioning of the wastewater treatment facility;

· Silt and debris should be removed from the temporary drainage channel regularly; and

· Any soil contaminated with chemicals/oils shall be removed from site and the void created shall be filled with suitable materials.

Waste management

· Reuse the excavated materials as far as practical to reduce the amount of waste disposal;

· Ensure drip trays are provided for chemical containers to prevent leakage or soil contamination;

· All plants and vehicles should be properly maintained to prevent oil leakage;

· Oil stains on soil should be cleared by disposal of contaminated soil;

· Ventilation should be provided for the Chemical Store Room.

Appendix A. Project Organization Chart

Contact information:

Company	Position	Name	Telephone / Mobile
Heng Shung Construction Co. Ltd. (The Contractor)	Assistant Construction Manager	Ms Lynne Hung	2908 2391
Heng Shung Construction Co. Ltd. (The Contractor)	Site Agent	Mr Poon Man Ho	9426 3533
Heng Shung Construction Co. Ltd. (The Contractor)	Environmental Officer	Mr. Lun Ho Yin	9866 7497
ENVIRON Hong Kong Ltd (IEC)	Independent Environmental Checker	Mr David Yeung	3743 0788
Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Ltd. (ET)	ET Team Leader	Ms Florence Yuen	2828 5768

Appendix B. Tentative Construction Programme

Appendix C. Action and Limit Levels for Construction Phase

Air Quality

Action and Limit Levels for 24-hour TSP

Monitoring Station	Action Level (mg/m³)	Limit Level (mg/m³)
ASR1	226	260
ASR2A	213	260
ASR3	205	260
ASR4	237	260

Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP

Monitoring Station	Action Level (mg/m³)	Limit Level (mg/m³)
ASR1	378	500
ASR2A	357	500
ASR3	358	500
ASR4	372	500

Noise

Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise

Time Period	Action Level	Limit Level
NSR1, NSR3, NSR5, NSR7
0700 – 1900 hours on normal weekdays	When one documented complaint is received from any one of the sensitive receivers	75 dB(A)

Water Quality

Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality

Parameters	DO in mg/L		Turbidity in NTU		SS in mg/L		pH
	Action Level	Limit Level	Action Level	Action Level	Action Level	Limit Level	Action Level	Limit Level
MP1	1.23	1.17	173	177	231	299	< 5.5 or > 7.5	< 4.0 or > 8.0
MP2	1.04	0.89	132	163	170	209
MP3	6.85	6.65	64	67	65	66
MP4	3.91	3.82	60	64	50	53
MP5	4.13	3.87	81	84	66	69
MP6	4.61	4.52	94	96	75	75

Appendix D. Event and Action Plan for Air Quality, Noise, Water Quality, Ecology and Landscape & Visual

Air Quality

Event	Action
Event	ET Leader	IEC	ER	Contractor
Action Level
1. Exceedance for one sample	1. Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and propose remedial measures. 2. Inform IEC and ER. 3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding. 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily.	1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET. 2. Check Contractor’s working method.	1. Notify Contractor.	1. Rectify any unacceptable practice. 2. Amend working methods if appropriate.
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples	1. Identify the source. 2. Inform IEC and ER. 3. Advise ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures 4. Repeat measurements to confirm findings. 5. Increase monitoring frequency to daily. 6. Discuss with IEC and the Contractor on remedial actions required. 7. If exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IEC and ER. 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring.	1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET. 2. Check the Contractor’s working method. 3. Discuss with ET Leader and the Contractor on possible remedial measures. 4. Advise ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures. 5. Supervise implementation of remedial measures.	1. Confirm receipt of notification of exceedance in writing. 2. Notify the Contractor. 3. Ensure remedial measures properly implemented.	1. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification. 2. Implement the agreed proposals. 3. Amend proposal if appropriate.
Limit Level
1. Exceedance for one sample	1. Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and propose remedial measures. 2. Inform ER and EPD. 3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding. 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily. 5. Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results.	1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET. 2. Check the Contractor’s working method. 3. Discuss with ET Leader and the Contractor on possible remedial measures. 4. Advise ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures. 5. Supervise implementation of remedial measures.	1. Confirm receipt of notification of exceedance in writing. 2. Notify the Contractor. 3. Ensure remedial measures properly implemented.	1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification. 3. Implement the agreed proposals. 4. Amend proposal if appropriate.
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples	1. Notify IEC, ER, EPD and the Contractor. 2. Identify the source. 3. Repeat measurements to confirm findings. 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily. 5. Carry out analysis of the Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented. 6. Arrange meeting IEC and ER to discuss the remedial actions to be taken. 7. Assess effectiveness of the Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results. 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring.	1. Discuss amongst ER, ET Leader and the Contractor on the potential remedial actions. 2. Review the Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary and advise ER accordingly. 3. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures.	1. Confirm receipt of notification of exceedance in writing. 2. Notify the Contractor. 3. In consultation with IEC, agree with the remedial measures to be implemented. 4. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented. 5. If exceedance continues, consider what activity of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that activity of work until the exceedance is abated.	1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification. 3. Implement the agreed proposals. 4. Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control. 5. Stop the relevant activity of works as determined by ER until the exceedance is abated.

Construction Noise

Event	Action
Event	ET Leader	IEC	ER	Contractor
Action Level	1. Notify IEC and the Contractor. 2. Carry out investigation. 3. Report the results of investigation to IEC and the Contractor. 4. Discuss with the Contractor and formulate remedial measures. 5. Increase monitoring frequency to check mitigation measures.	1. Review with analysed results submitted by ET. 2. Review the proposed remedial measures by the Contractor and advise ER accordingly. 3. Supervise the implement of remedial measures.	1. Confirm receipt of notification of exceedance in writing. 2. Notify the Contractor. 3. Require the Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem. 4. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented.	1. Submit noise mitigation proposals to IEC. 2. Implement noise mitigation proposals.
Limit Level	1. Identify the source. 2. Notify IEC, ER, EPD and the Contractor. 3. Repeat measurement to confirm findings. 4. Increase monitoring frequency. 5. Carry out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented. 6. Inform IEC, ER, and EPD the causes & actions taken for the exceedances. 7. Assess effectiveness of the Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results. 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring.	1. Discuss amongst ER, ET Leader and the Contractor on the potential remedial actions. 2. Review the Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their effectiveness and advise ER accordingly. 3. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures.	1. Confirm receipt of notification of exceedance in writing. 2. Notify the Contractor. 3. Require the Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem. 4. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented. 5. If exceedance continues, consider what activity of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that activity of work until the exceedance is abated.	1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification. 3. Implement the agreed proposals. 4. Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control. 5. Stop the relevant activity of works as determined by the ER until the exceedance is abated.

Water Quality

Event	Action
Event	ET Leader	IEC	ER	Contractor
Action Level
1. Exceedance for one sample	1. Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm finding; 2. Identify source(s) of impact; 3. Inform IEC and Contractor; 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods; 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor; and 6. Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance.	1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals on mitigation measures submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly; and 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures.	1. Discuss with IEC on the proposed mitigation measures; and 2. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented.	1. Inform the ER and confirm notification of the non-compliance in writing; 2. Rectify unacceptable practice; 3. Check all plant and equipment; 4. Consider changes of working methods; 5. Discuss with ET and IEC and propose mitigation measures to IEC and ER; and 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures.
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples	1. Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm finding; 2. Identify source(s) of impact; 3. Inform IEC and Contractor; 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods; 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor; 6. Ensure mitigation measures are implemented; 7. Prepare to increase the monitoring frequency to daily; and 8. Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance.	1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals on mitigation measures submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly; and 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures.	1. Discuss with IEC on the proposed mitigation measures; 2. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented; and 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures.	1. Inform the Engineer and confirm notification of the non-compliance in writing; 2. Rectify unacceptable practice; 3. Check all plant and equipment; 4. Consider changes of working methods; 5. Discuss with ET and IEC and propose mitigation measures to IEC and ER within 3 working days; and 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures.
Limit Level
1. Exceedance for one sample	1. Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm finding; 2. Identify source(s) of impact; 3. Inform IEC, Contractor and EPD; 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods; 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC, ER and Contractor; 6. Ensure mitigation measures are implemented; and 7. Increase the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Limit level.	1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals on mitigation measures submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly; and 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures.	1. Discuss with IEC, ET and Contractor on the proposed mitigation measures; and 2. Request Contractor to critically review the working methods; 3. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented; and 4. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures.	1. Inform the Engineer and confirm notification of the non-compliance in writing; 2. Rectify unacceptable practice; 3. Check all plant and equipment; 4. Consider changes of working methods; 5. Discuss with ET and IEC and ER and propose mitigation measures to IEC and ER within 3 working days; and 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures.
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples	1. Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm finding; 2. Identify source(s) of impact; 3. Inform IEC, Contractor and EPD; 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods; 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC, ER and Contractor; 6. Ensure mitigation measures are implemented; and 7. Increase the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Limit level for two consecutive days.	1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals on mitigation measures submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly; and 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures.	1. Discuss with IEC, ET and Contractor on the proposed mitigation measures; and 2. Request Contractor to critically review the working methods; 3. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented; 4. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures; and 5. Consider and instruct, if necessary, the Contractor to slow down or to stop all or part of the marine work until no exceedance of Limit Level.	1. Inform the ER and confirm notification of the non-compliance in writing; 2. Rectify unacceptable practice; 3. Check all plant and equipment; 4. Consider changes of working methods; 5. Discuss with ET and IEC and ER and propose mitigation measures to IEC and ER within 3 working days; 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures; and 7. As directed by the Engineer, to slow down or to stop all or part of the marine work or construction activities.

Appendix E. Calibration certificates

Appendix F. Graphical plots of the monitoring results

Appendix G. Weather conditions during the monitoring period

Appendix H. Ecological Monitoring conducted in June 2010

June 2010	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
Mammals	ü			ü				ü	ü					ü	ü
Birds	ü							ü						ü
Herpetofauna				ü					ü
Dragonflies & butterflies				ü											ü
Inspection Visits	ü							ü						ü

June 2010	16	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
Mammals						ü
Birds						ü
Herpetofauna
Dragonflies & butterflies
Inspection Visits			ü			ü		ü		ü

* Light grey cells indicated public holidays or Sundays.

Appendix I. Summary of Bird Surveys conducted in June 2010

		Conservation Status ⁽²⁾	June
Species Name	*Scientific Name*	Conservation Status ⁽²⁾	Survey ⁽³⁾	Mean ⁽⁴⁾
Little Grebe	Tachybaptus ruficollis	LC, (1)	4	11.75
Great Egret	Egretta alba	PRC, (1)	4	30.50
Little Egret	Egretta garzetta	PRC, (1)	4	56.25
Cattle Egret	Bubulcus ibis	(LC), (1)	2	0.50
Chinese Pond Heron	Ardeola bacchus	PRC, (1)	4	25.00
Black-crowned Night Heron	Nycticorax nycticorax	LC, (1)	4	10.75
Yellow Bittern	Ixobrychus sinensis	(LC) (1)	1	0.25
White-breasted Waterhen	Amaurornis phoenicurus	(1)	4	5.75
Little Ringed Plover	Charadrius dubius	LC, (1)	4	10.75
Common Greenshank	Tringa nebularia	RC, (1)	4	1.00
Pied Kingfisher	Ceryle rudis	LC, (1)	2	1.00
Common Kingfisher	Alcedo atthis	(1)	4	3.25
Zitting Cisticola	Cisticola juncidis	LC, (1)	2	0.75
White-shouldered Starling	Sturnus sinensis	(LC)	3	5.50
Red-rumped Swallow	Hirundo daurica	-	1	1.25
			15

(1) indicates wetland-dependant or -associated species.

(2) Conservation status follows that of Fellowes et al. (2002) and BirdLife International listing (2010).

(3) indicates number of surveys recorded within the survey period.

(4) equals the average number of individual species surveyed in each survey (i.e. total counts in all surveys divided by number of surveys)

Appendix J. Summary of Herpetofauna, and Insects Surveys conducted in June 2010

Table J1. Summary of herpetofauna surveys conducted between 1 June and 30 June 2010

Species Name	*Scientific Name*	Conservation Status⁽¹⁾	June
		Conservation Status⁽¹⁾	Survey⁽²⁾	Mean⁽³⁾
Amphibians			2
Günther’s Frog	Rana guentheri	-	2	2.0
Ornate Pigmy Frog	Microhyla ornata	-	1	0.5
			Survey⁽²⁾	Mean⁽³⁾
Reptile			1
Bowring’s Gecko	Hemidactylus bowringii	-	1	1.0

(1) Conservation status follows that of Fellowes et al. (2002), Chan et al. (2005) and Karsen et al. (1998).

(2) indicates number of surveys recorded within the survey period.

(3) equals the average number of individual species surveyed in each survey (i.e. total counts in all surveys divided by number of surveys)

Table J2. Summary of mammal observed conducted between 1 June and 30 June 2010

Species Name	*Scientific Name*	Conservation Status⁽¹⁾	June
(No Records in June 2010)

Table J3. Summary of insect surveys conducted between 1 June and 30 June 2010

Common Name	*Scientific Name*	Conservation Status⁽¹⁾	June
		Conservation Status⁽¹⁾	Survey⁽²⁾	Mean⁽³⁾
Odonate			9
Common Bluetail	Aschnura senegalensis	-	2	2.0
Pale-spotted Emperor	Anax guttatus	-	1	0.5
Asian Amberwing	Brachythemis contaminata	-	2	6.0
Coastal Glider	Macrodiplax cora	LC	2	14.0
Green Skimmer	Orthetrum sabina	-	2	5.0
Wandering Glider	Pantala flavescens	-	1	0.5
Variegated Flutterer	Rhyothemis variegata	-	2	12.5
Saddlebag Glider	Tramea virginia	-	1	0.5
Scarlet Basker	Urothemis signata	LC	1	1.5
Butterfly			7
Spangle	Papilio protenor	-	1	0.5
Red-base Jezebel	Delias pasithoe	-	2	1.0
Indian Cabbage White	Pieris canidia	-	2	7.0
Mottled Emigrant	Catopsilia pyranthe	-	1	1.5
Common Grass Yellow	Eurema hecabe	-	2	2.5
Pale Grass Blue	Zizeeria maha	-	1	1.5
Lesser Grass Blue	Zizina otis	-	1	0.5

(1) Conservation status follows that of Fellowes et al. (2002), Lo & Hui (2004), Wilson (2004) and Young & Yiu (2002).

(2) indicates number of surveys recorded within the survey period.

(3) equals the average number of individual species surveyed in each survey (i.e. total counts in all surveys divided by number of surveys)

1.3 Environmental Status in the reporting period

1.4 Summary of EM&A Requirements

2. Impact Monitoring Methodology

2.2.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

2.2.2 Monitoring Locations

2.2.3 Monitoring Equipments

2.2.4 Monitoring Methodology

2.3.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

2.3.2 Monitoring Locations

2.3.3 Monitoring Equipments

2.3.4 Monitoring Methodology

2.4.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

2.4.2 Monitoring Locations

2.4.3 Monitoring Equipments

2.4.4 Monitoring Methodology

2.5.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

2.5.2 Monitoring Locations and Methodology

2.6.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

2.6.2 Monitoring Locations

3.2.1.1 1-hr TSP

3.2.1.2 24-hr TSP

3.2.2 Construction Noise Monitoring

3.2.3 Water Quality Monitoring

5.1 Site Inspection

6.1 Site Inspection

7.5 Follow-up actions taken

8.1 Site Preparatory Works and Construction Works for the Coming Month

8.4.1 Conclusions

8.4.2 Recommendations

Appendix C. Action and Limit Levels for Construction Phase

Appendix D. Event and Action Plan for Air Quality, Noise, Water Quality, Ecology and Landscape & Visual

Appendix E. Calibration certificates

Appendix F. Graphical plots of the monitoring results

Appendix G. Weather conditions during the monitoring period

Appendix H. Ecological Monitoring conducted in June 2010

Appendix I. Summary of Bird Surveys conducted in June 2010

Appendix J. Summary of Herpetofauna, and Insects Surveys conducted in June 2010

Appendix K. Environmental Mitigation Measures - Implementation Status